Legal Information |
|
The correct design should reflect the goals of your CRM strategy. These might be:
For sales people to use the system fully, it must be both useful to them and easy to use, so don't make the design too complicated. The more complicated the design is, the more fields you add to each screen, the more screens you have to go through to add a contact, the more barriers to successful adoption you will have erected.
Every extra field you ask the sales person to complete, especially mandatory ones, the greater the chance that the sales people will enter garbage, leave fields un-entered, or simple only use the system under duress.
So,
Should you solicit the views of everybody in each department, or should you simply impose a system because you know best?
Both approaches have their drawbacks. In the former 'design by committee', the risk is that in order to please everybody the resulting design will incorporate every feature ever invented, and then some more.
This will result in a complex system that will be expensive to purchase and set up, and then fail because people can't use it, or can't be bothered to use it.
Design by dictatorship will result in a lean minimalist system, easy and fast to use, but the risk is that other departments may reject it because they weren't consulted. You need to ask everybody want they want, ask them again what they really need, decide for yourself what the pay off is between functionality, cost and ease of use, then get everybody's buy in for the final design by cajoling and argument.
Search Knowledge Base | Feedback |